Mikhail Sergeevich Voskresensky |

UMikhail Voskresensky

Udumo luza kumculi ngezindlela ezahlukene. Omunye uduma ngokungalindelekile kwabanye (kwesinye isikhathi ezenzela yena). Inkazimulo imkhanyela khona manjalo futhi ngokumangalisayo; yile ndlela uVan Cliburn angena ngayo emlandweni wokusebenza kwepiyano. Abanye baqala kancane. Ngokungabonakali ekuqaleni embuthanweni wozakwethu, bathola ukuqashelwa kancane kancane futhi kancane kancane - kodwa amagama abo avame ukubizwa ngenhlonipho enkulu. Le ndlela, njengoba okuhlangenwe nakho kubonisa, ngokuvamile ithembekile futhi iyiqiniso. Kwaba kubo ukuthi uMikhail Voskresensky wangena kwezobuciko.

Wayenenhlanhla: isiphetho samhlanganisa noLev Nikolaevich Oborin. E-Oborin ekuqaleni kweminyaka engamashumi amahlanu - ngesikhathi lapho uVoskresensky eqala ukuwela umngcele wekilasi lakhe - babengekho abadlali bopiyano abaningi abakhanyayo phakathi kwabafundi bakhe. UVoskresensky wakwazi ukunqoba ukuhola, waba ngomunye wezibulo phakathi kwabaphumelele imincintiswano yamazwe ngamazwe elungiselelwe uprofesa wakhe. Ngaphezu kwalokho. Ukuvinjelwa, ngezinye izikhathi, mhlawumbe kancane ebudlelwaneni bakhe nentsha yabafundi, u-Oborin wenza okuhlukile kuVoskresensky - wamkhetha phakathi kwabanye abafundi bakhe, wamenza umsizi wakhe e-conservatory. Iminyaka eminingana, lo mculi osemusha wasebenza ngokubambisana nenkosi edumile. Yena, njenganoma ubani omunye, wadalulwa izimfihlo ezifihliwe Oborinsky ukwenza futhi art pedagogical. Ukuxhumana no-Oborin kwanikeza uVoskresensky okuningi kakhulu, kwanquma ezinye zezici ezibalulekile zokubukeka kwakhe kwezobuciko. Kodwa okuningi ngalokho kamuva.

UMikhail Sergeevich Voskresensky wazalelwa edolobheni laseBerdyansk (isifunda saseZaporozhye). Walahlekelwa nguyise kusenesikhathi, owashona phakathi neMpi Enkulu Yokushisekela Izwe. Wakhuliswa ngunina; wayenguthisha womculo futhi wafundisa indodana yakhe isifundo sokuqala sepiyano. Eminyakeni yokuqala ngemva kokuphela kwempi Voskresensky wachitha Sevastopol. Wafunda esikoleni esiphakeme, waqhubeka nokudlala upiyano ngaphansi kokuqondisa kukanina. Khona-ke umfana wathunyelwa eMoscow.

Wamukelwa e-Ippolitov-Ivanov Musical College futhi wathunyelwa ekilasini lika-Ilya Rubinovich Klyachko. "Ngingasho kuphela amazwi anomusa ngalo muntu omuhle kakhulu nochwepheshe," uVoskresensky uhlanganyela izinkumbulo zakhe zesikhathi esidlule. “Ngafika kuye ngisemusha; Ngavalelisa kuye ngemva kweminyaka emine njengomculi osekhulile, sengifunde okuningi, sengifunde okuningi … U-Klyachko waqeda imibono yami yobuntwana ewubuwula ngokudlala upiyano. Ungenzele imisebenzi yobuciko ejulile nokwenza, wethula izithombe zangempela zomculo emhlabeni… "

Esikoleni, uVoskresensky wabonisa ngokushesha amakhono akhe emvelo amangalisayo. Wayevame ukudlala futhi ngempumelelo emicimbini evulekile nasemakhonsathini. Wasebenza ngentshiseko kumasu: wafunda, isibonelo, zonke izifundo ezingamashumi amahlanu (ikhasi 740) nguCzerny; lokhu kwasiqinisa kakhulu isikhundla sakhe ekushayeni upiyano. (“UCherny wangilethela inzuzo enkulu ngendlela engavamile njengomdlali. Ngeke ngituse noma yimuphi umdlali wopiyano osemusha ukuba angamlaleli lo mbhali phakathi nezifundo zakhe.”) Ngamafuphi, akuzange kube nzima ngaye ukungena eMoscow Conservatory. Wabhaliswa njengomfundi owenza unyaka wokuqala ngo-1953. Isikhathi esithile, u-Ya. I. UMilshtein wayenguthisha wakhe, kodwa ngokushesha, wathuthela e-Oborin.

Kwakuyisikhathi esishisayo, esishubile emlandweni wesikhungo somculo esidala kunazo zonke kuleli. Isikhathi sokwenza imincintiswano saqala… UVoskresensky, njengomunye wabadlali bopiyano abahamba phambili “nabaqine kakhulu” bekilasi lase-Oborinsky, wasihlonipha ngokugcwele isasasa elivamile. Ngo-1956 waya ku-International Schumann Competition eBerlin futhi wabuya lapho nomklomelo wesithathu. Ngemva konyaka, uba "nethusi" emqhudelwaneni wepiyano eRio de Janeiro. 1958 - IBucharest, umncintiswano we-Enescu, umklomelo wesibili. Ekugcineni, ngo-1962, waphothula “imarathon” yakhe yokuncintisana emqhudelwaneni kaVan Cliburn e-USA (indawo yesithathu).

“Mhlawumbe, bekunemiqhudelwano eminingi kakhulu endleleni yami yokuphila. Kodwa hhayi njalo, niyabo, yonke into lapha yayincike kimi. Ngezinye izikhathi izimo zaziba kangangokuthi kwakungenakwenzeka ukwenqaba ukuhlanganyela emncintiswaneni ... Futhi-ke, kufanele ngivume, imincintiswano yathathwa, yathathwa - intsha iyintsha. Banikeze okuningi ngomqondo wobungcweti, baba nesandla enqubekela phambili yomculo wopiyano, baletha imibono eminingi ecacile: injabulo nosizi, amathemba nokudumazeka ... Yebo, yebo, kanye nokudumazeka, ngoba emiqhudelwaneni - manje ngikwazi kahle lokhu - indima yenhlanhla, injabulo, ithuba likhulu kakhulu ... "

Kusukela ekuqaleni kweminyaka engamashumi ayisithupha, iVoskresensky yaduma kakhulu emibuthanweni yomculo yaseMoscow. Unikeza ngempumelelo amakhonsathi (GDR, Czechoslovakia, Bulgaria, Romania, Japan, Iceland, Poland, Brazil); ukhombisa ukuthanda ukufundisa. Usizo luka-Oborin luphetha ngokuthi uphathiswe ikilasi lakhe (1963). Lo mculi osemncane ukhulunyelwa phezulu nangaphezulu njengomunye wabalandeli abaqondile nabangaguquki bomugqa ka-Oborin kupiyano.

Futhi ngesizathu esihle. Njengothisha wakhe, uVoskresensky kusukela esemncane wayebonakala ngokubukeka okuzolile, okucacile nokuhlakaniphile emculweni awenza. Okunjalo, ngakolunye uhlangothi, kuyimvelo yakhe, ngakolunye uhlangothi, umphumela weminyaka eminingi yokukhulumisana kokudala noprofesa. Akukho okweqile noma okungafani ekudlaleni kukaVoskresensky, emiqondweni yakhe yokuhumusha. Ukuhleleka okuhle kakhulu kukho konke okwenziwa kukhibhodi; yonke indawo nakuyo yonke indawo - ngokwezigaba zomsindo, izinga lokushisa, imininingwane yobuchwepheshe - ukulawula okuqinile. Ekuchazeni kwakhe, cishe akukho ukuphikisana, ukuphikisana kwangaphakathi; okubaluleke nakakhulu ekuboniseni isitayela sakhe akulutho komuntu siqu ngokweqile. Ukulalela abadlali bopiyano abafana naye, ngezinye izikhathi ufika engqondweni amazwi kaWagner, owathi umculo owenziwe ngokucacile, ngencazelo yangempela yobuciko kanye nezinga eliphezulu lobuchwepheshe - "ngokufanele", ngamazwi omqambi omkhulu - uletha " umuzwa ongcwele” ukwaneliseka okungenamibandela (Wagner R. Mayelana nokuqhuba// Ukuqhuba ukusebenza. - M., 1975. P. 124.). Futhi uBruno Walter, njengoba wazi, wadlulela phambili, ekholelwa ukuthi ukunemba kokusebenza “kukhanyisa ukugqama.” UVoskresensky, siyaphinda, ungumdlali wopiyano onembile ...

Futhi esinye isici sokwenza izincazelo zakhe: kuzo, njengakuqala no-Oborin, akukho injabulo encane yomzwelo, hhayi isithunzi sokuthinta. Akukho lutho olusuka ekuzilinganiseni ekuboniseni imizwa. Yonke indawo - kusukela kokwakudala komculo kuya ku-expressionism, kusukela ku-Handel kuya ku-Honegger - ukuzwana ngokomoya, ibhalansi enhle yokuphila kwangaphakathi. Ubuciko, njengoba izazi zefilosofi zazivame ukusho, zingaphezu kwe-"Apollonian" kunokuba "i-Dionysian" yokugcina ...

Echaza umdlalo weVoskresensky, umuntu akakwazi ukuthula ngesiko elilodwa lesikhathi eside nelibonakala kahle kwezobuciko bomculo nokwenza. (Ngopiyano lwakwamanye amazwe, kuvame ukuhlotshaniswa namagama ka-E. Petri kanye no-R. Casadesus, ku-piyano yaseSoviet, futhi negama lika-LN Oborin.) Leli siko libeka inqubo yokusebenza phambili. umqondo wesakhiwo isebenza. Kubaculi ababambelela kukho, ukwenza umculo akuyona inqubo yemizwa ezenzakalelayo, kodwa ukudalulwa okungaguquki kokunengqondo kobuciko bento. Akuyona inkulumo ezenzakalelayo yentando, kodwa "ukwakha" okwenziwe kahle nangokucophelela. Bona, laba baculi, bahlala benaka izimfanelo zobuhle zefomu lomculo: ukuvumelana kwesakhiwo somsindo, isilinganiso sayo yonke kanye nemininingwane, ukuqondanisa kwezilinganiso. Akuyona into engaqondakali ukuthi u-IR Klyachko, ongcono kunanoma ubani omunye owazi indlela yokudala yomfundi wakhe wangaphambili, wabhala kwesinye sezibuyekezo ukuthi uVoskresensky uyakwazi ukufeza "into enzima kakhulu - ukuvezwa kwefomu lilonke" ; imibono efanayo ngokuvamile ingazwakala kwabanye ochwepheshe. Ezimpendulweni zamakhonsathi kaVoskresensky, kuvame ukugcizelelwa ukuthi izenzo zomdlali wopiyano zicatshangelwa kahle, ziqinisekiswa, futhi zibalwe. Nokho, ngezinye izikhathi abagxeki bakholelwa ukuthi konke lokhu kuthiza ubungqabavu bomuzwa wakhe osankondlo: “Ngazo zonke lezi zici ezinhle,” kuphawula uL. Zhivov, “ngezinye izikhathi umuntu uzizwa ebambezeleke ngokwedlulele ngokomzwelo ekudlaleni komdlali wopiyano; kungenzeka ukuthi isifiso sokunemba, ukunemba okukhethekile kwemininingwane ngayinye kwesinye isikhathi kuya ekulimaleni kokuthuthukiswa, ukushesha kokusebenza ” (Zhivov L. All Chopin nocturnes//Impilo yomculo. 1970. No. 9. S.). Hhayi-ke, mhlawumbe umgxeki uqinisile, futhi uVoskresensky akahlali njalo, hhayi kuwo wonke amakhonsathi ahehayo futhi awokhele. Kodwa cishe njalo ekholisa (Ngesinye isikhathi, u-B. Asafiev wabhala ngemuva kwemidlalo e-USSR yomqhubi ovelele waseJalimane u-Hermann Abendroth: "U-Abendroth uyazi ukukholisa, hhayi njalo ukukwazi ukuthungatha, ukuphakamisa nokuthakatha" (B. Asafiev. Okubalulekile. izihloko, izindatshana nezibuyekezo. – M .; L., 1967. S. 268). U-LN Oborin wayehlale eqinisekisa izethameli zamashumi amane namashumi amahlanu ngendlela efanayo; lokho empeleni kuwumphumela emphakathini womfundi wakhe.

Uvame ukubizwa ngomculi onesikole esihle kakhulu. Nangu ngempela indodana yesikhathi sakhe, isizukulwane, imvelo. Futhi ngaphandle kokweqisa, okunye okuhle kakhulu ... Esiteji, ulungile njalo: abaningi bangaba nomona ngenhlanganisela ejabulisayo yesikole, ukuzinza kwengqondo, ukuzithiba. U-Oborin wake wabhala: "Ngokujwayelekile, ngikholelwa ukuthi, okokuqala, bekungeke kube buhlungu ukuthi wonke umculi abe nemithetho eyishumi nambili noma emibili" yokuziphatha okuhle emculweni ". Le mithetho kufanele ihlobane nokuqukethwe kanye nendlela yokusebenza, ubuhle bomsindo, ukupedalisa, njll. (Oborin L. Kweminye izimiso zesu lokusebenzisa upiyano Imibuzo yokusebenza kwepiyano. – M., 1968. Issue 2. P. 71.). Akumangalisi ukuthi uVoskresensky, omunye wabalandeli bokudala be-Oborin nalabo abasondelene naye, wakwazi ngokuqinile le mithetho phakathi nezifundo zakhe; baba yimvelo yesibili kuye. Noma ngabe yimuphi umbhali afaka ezinhlelweni zakhe, emdlalweni wakhe umuntu angahlala ezwa imingcele eshiwo ngokukhuliswa ngendlela engenasici, imikhuba yasesiteji, nokunambitheka okuhle kakhulu. Ngaphambili, kwenzeka, cha, cha, yebo, futhi weqa le mingcele; umuntu angakhumbula, isibonelo, izincazelo zakhe zeminyaka yamashumi ayisithupha - Kreisleriana kaSchumann kanye neVienna Carnival, kanye neminye imisebenzi. (Kukhona irekhodi legilamafoni likaVoskresensky, elisikhumbuza ngokucacile lezi zincazelo.) Ekushisekeleni kobusha, ngezinye izikhathi wayezivumela ukuba one ngandlela thize ngokumelene nalokho okushiwo ngokwenza “comme il faut”. Kodwa lokho kwakungaphambili, manje, akukaze kwenzeke.

Ngeminyaka yama-XNUMX no-XNUMX, uVoskresensky wacula izingoma ezimbalwa - i-sonata enkulu ye-B-flat, izikhathi zomculo kanye nenganekwane ka-Schubert ethi “Wanderer”, Ikhonsathi Yesine Yepiyano ka-Beethoven, Ikhonsathi kaSchnittke, nokunye okuningi. Futhi kufanele ngisho ukuthi uhlelo ngalunye lomshayi wopiyano lwaletha imizuzu eminingi emnandi ngempela emphakathini: imihlangano nabantu abahlakaniphile, abafundile ngokungenasici ihlale ijabulisa - ihholo lekhonsathi alihlukile kulokhu.

Ngasikhathi sinye, kungaba okungalungile ukukholelwa ukuthi ukufaneleka kweVoskresensky kusebenza kuphela ngaphansi kwesethi ethile yemithetho emihle kakhulu - futhi kuphela ... Ukunambitha kwakhe nomuzwa womculo kuvela emvelweni. Ebusheni bakhe, wayengaba nabeluleki abafaneleka kakhulu - kodwa nokho lokho okuhlanganisa okuyinhloko nokusondelene kakhulu emsebenzini womdwebi, nabo babengeke bafundise. “Ukube besifundisa ukunambitheka nethalente ngosizo lwemithetho,” kusho umdwebi odumile uD. Reynolds, “bekungeke kusaba khona ukunambitha noma ithalente” (Mayelana nomculo nabaculi. – L., 1969. S. 148.).

Njengotolika, uVoskresensky uthanda ukuthatha umculo ohlukahlukene. Ezinkulumweni zomlomo neziphrintiwe, wakhuluma izikhathi ezingaphezu kwesisodwa, futhi ngokuqiniseka, ngochungechunge olubanzi kakhulu lweciko lokuvakasha. “Umdlali wopiyano,” esho kwesinye sezihloko zakhe, “ngokungafani nomqambi, ozwela lwakhe luncike ekuqondisweni kwethalente lakhe, kufanele akwazi ukudlala umculo wababhali abahlukahlukene. Akakwazi ukukhawulela akuthandayo kunoma yisiphi isitayela esithile. Umshayi wopiyano wesimanje kufanele enze izinto ezihlukahlukene” (Voskresensky M. Oborin - umculi nothisha / / LN Oborin. Izihloko. Izikhumbuzo. - M., 1977. P. 154.). Akulula ngempela kuVoskresensky ngokwakhe ukuhlukanisa lokho okungaba ngcono kuye njengomdlali wekhonsathi. Maphakathi nawo-XNUMX, wadlala wonke ama-sonatas kaBeethoven emjikelezweni wama-clavirabends amaningana. Ingabe lokhu kusho ukuthi indima yakhe ingeyakudala? Nakancane. Ngoba yena, ngesinye isikhathi, wadlala wonke ama-nocturnes, ama-polonaise kanye nenani leminye imisebenzi kaChopin kumarekhodi. Kodwa futhi, lokho akusho okuningi. Kumaphosta amakhonsathi akhe kukhona izandulela kanye namafugue kaShostakovich, i-sonatas kaProkofiev, ikhonsathi kaKhachaturian, esebenza nguBartok, uHindemith, uMilhaud, uBerg, uRossellini, amanoveli epiyano kaShchedrin, u-Eshpai, uDenisov ... Kuyaphawuleka, nokho, hhayi ukuthi uyawenza kakhulu. Ihluke ngokuphawulekayo. Ezifundeni ezihlukahlukene zesitayela, uzizwa ezolile futhi eqiniseka ngokulinganayo. Lona yonke iVoskresensky: emandleni okugcina ibhalansi yokudala yonke indawo, ukugwema ukungalingani, ukweqisa, ukutsheka kolunye uhlangothi noma kwenye.

Abaculi abafana naye ngokuvamile banekhono lokuveza uhlobo lomculo abawenzayo, bedlulisela “umoya” kanye “nohlamvu”. Lokhu ngokungangabazeki kuwuphawu lwesiko labo eliphezulu lochwepheshe. Nokho, kungase kube ne-drawback eyodwa lapha. Sekuvele kushiwo ngaphambili ukuthi umdlalo kaVoskresensky kwesinye isikhathi awunakho ukucaciswa, iphimbo lomuntu ngamunye elichazwe ngokucacile. Ngempela, i-Chopin yakhe iyi-euphony kakhulu, ukuvumelana kwemigqa, okwenza "ithoni ye-bon". U-Beethoven kuye kokubili ithoni edingekayo, kanye nesifiso esinamandla, kanye ne-architectonics eqinile, eyakhiwe ngokugcwele, edingekayo emisebenzini yalo mbhali. U-Schubert ekudluliseni kwakhe ubonisa izici nezici eziningi ezitholakala ku-Schubert; amaBrahms akhe cishe “amaphesenti ayikhulu” amaBrahms, uLiszt nguLiszt, njll. Kwesinye isikhathi umuntu usengathanda ukuzwa emisebenzini okungeyakhe, “izakhi zofuzo” zakhe zokudala. UStanislavsky wabiza imisebenzi yobuciko bemidlalo yaseshashalazini ngokuthi “izidalwa eziphilayo”, ezizuza njengefa izici ezivamile zabo bobabili “abazali” babo: le misebenzi, wathi, kufanele imele “umoya ovela emoyeni nasenyameni enyameni” yombhali wemidlalo yeshashalazi nomculi. Mhlawumbe, okufanayo kufanele kube ngokomgomo ekusebenzeni komculo ...

Kodwa-ke, akekho umnumzane ongeke akwazi ukukhuluma negama lakhe laphakade elithi "ngingathanda." Uvuko lunjalo.

Izakhiwo zemvelo kaVoskresensky, ezibalwe ngenhla, zimenza uthisha owazalwa. Unikeza izigceme zakhe cishe yonke into enganikezwa abafundi kwezobuciko - ulwazi olubanzi namasiko ochwepheshe; ubangenisa ezimfihlakalweni zobungcweti; ugxilisa amasiko esikole akhulele kuso. U-EI Kuznetsova, umfundi waseVoskresensky nowawine umncintiswano wopiyano eBelgrade, uthi: “UMikhail Sergeevich uyakwazi ukwenza umfundi aqonde cishe ngokushesha phakathi nesifundo ukuthi yimiphi imisebenzi abhekene nayo nokuthi yini okudingeka asetshenzwe ngokwengeziwe. Lokhu kubonisa ithalenta elikhulu lokufundisa likaMikhail Sergeevich. Bengilokhu ngimangazwa indlela asheshe afinyelele ngayo enhliziyweni yenkinga yomfundi. Futhi hhayi nje ukungena, yebo: ngokuba umdlali wopiyano omuhle kakhulu, uMikhail Sergeevich uyazi njalo indlela ukuphakamisa kanjani futhi kuphi ukuthola indlela engokoqobo yokuphuma ebunzimeni obuvelayo.

Isici sakhe sesici siwukuthi, - uyaqhubeka EI Kuznetsova, - ukuthi ungumculi ocabanga ngempela. Ukucabanga ngobubanzi nangokungajwayelekile. Ngokwesibonelo, wayehlale ematasa ngezinkinga “zobuchwepheshe” bokudlala upiyano. Wacabanga kakhulu, futhi akayeki ukucabanga ngokukhiqizwa komsindo, ukuhamba ngezinyawo, ukuhlalisa insimbi, ukuma kwesandla, amasu, njll. Uhlanganyela ngokukhululekile ngokuqaphela kwakhe nemicabango yakhe nabantu abasha. Imihlangano naye yenza kusebenze ubuhlakani bomculo, ithuthukise futhi iyicebise…

Kodwa mhlawumbe okubaluleke kakhulu, uthelela ikilasi ngomdlandla wakhe wokudala. Ifaka uthando lobuciko bangempela, obuphezulu. Ugxilisa kubafundi bakhe ukwethembeka nobuqotho bomsebenzi, okuyisici sakhe ngokwezinga elikhulu. Ngokwesibonelo, angakwazi ukuza endaweni yokugcinwa kwezilwane ngokushesha ngemva kohambo olukhathazayo, cishe aqonde ngqo esitimeleni, futhi, ngokushesha aqale amakilasi, asebenze ngokuzidela, ngokuzinikela okuphelele, engazigodli yena noma umfundi, engaboni ukukhathala, isikhathi esichithiwe. … Ngandlela-thile waphonsa umusho onjalo (ngiwukhumbula kahle): “Lapho amandla engeziwe owachitha ezindabeni zokudala, abuyiselwa ngokushesha nangokugcwele ngokwengeziwe.” Uphelele kula mazwi.

Ngaphandle kukaKuznetsova, ikilasi likaVoskresensky lalihlanganisa abaculi abasha abadumile, abahlanganyeli emiqhudelwaneni yamazwe ngamazwe: E. Krushevsky, M. Rubatskite, N. Trull, T. Siprashvili, L. Berlinskaya; UStanislav Igolinsky, owawina uMqhudelwano Wesihlanu weTchaikovsky, naye wafunda lapha - ukuziqhenya kukaVoskresensky njengothisha, umculi onethalente elivelele ngempela nokuthandwa okufanele. Abanye abafundi baseVoskresensky, ngaphandle kokuthola udumo olukhulu, nokho baphila impilo ethokozisayo futhi enobuhlakani egcwele igazi kwezobuciko bomculo - bafundisa, badlale ngama-ensembles, futhi benza umsebenzi ohambisana nawo. UVoskresensky wake wathi uthisha kufanele ahlulelwe ngalokho abamele abafundi bakhe kuya, ngemuva ukuqeda isifundo - emkhakheni ozimele. Iziphetho zeningi labafundi bakhe zikhuluma ngaye njengothisha wekilasi eliphezulu ngempela.

"Ngiyakuthanda ukuvakashela amadolobha aseSiberia," kusho uVoskresensky. - Kungani lapho? Ngoba kimina, abantu baseSiberia baye bagcina isimo sengqondo esimsulwa nesiqondile ngomculo. Akukho lokho kuneliseka, lokho kufiphala kwabalaleli oke ukuzwe emahholo ethu edolobha elikhulu. Futhi ukuze umdlali abone isasasa lomphakathi, ukulangazelela kwakhe ubuciko okuqotho kuyinto ebaluleke kakhulu.

I-Voskresensky ivame ukuvakashela izikhungo zamasiko zaseSiberia, ezinkulu futhi hhayi ezinkulu kakhulu; uyaziwa futhi waziswa lapha. “Njengawo wonke amaciko okuvakasha, “nginamaphuzu” ekhonsathi asondele kakhulu kimina - amadolobha lapho ngihlale ngizizwa ngixhumene kahle nezithameli.

Futhi ingabe uyazi ukuthi yini enye engiye ngayithanda kamuva nje, okungukuthi, ngangiyithanda ngaphambili, futhi nakakhulu manje? Yenza phambi kwezingane. Njengomthetho, emihlanganweni enjalo kukhona umoya othakazelisayo futhi ofudumele. Angikaze ngiziphike le njabulo.

… Ngo-1986-1988, uVoskresensky waya eFrance izinyanga zasehlobo, eTours, lapho abamba iqhaza emsebenzini we-International Academy of Music. Emini wayenikeza izifundo ezivulekile, kusihlwa wayecula emakhonsathini. Futhi, njengoba kuvame ukuba njalo ngabadlali bethu, waletha umshini omuhle kakhulu ekhaya - inqwaba yokubuyekezwa (“Izinyathelo ezinhlanu zazanele ukuqonda ukuthi kunento engavamile eyenzeka esiteji,” kubhala iphephandaba i-Nouvelle Republique ngo-July 1988, ngemva kokudlala kukaVoskresensky kuyi-Tours, lapho ayedlala khona u-Chopin Scriabin no-Mussorgsky. “Amakhasi ezwakale okungenani abantu abayikhulu. izikhathi zashintshwa ngamandla ethalente lalobu buntu bobuciko obumangalisayo.”). “Ngaphesheya, baphendula ngokushesha nangokushesha emaphephandabeni ngezenzakalo zempilo yomculo. Kuhlala kuphela ukuzisola ukuthi thina, njengomthetho, asinakho lokhu. Sivame ukukhala ngokungafiki kahle emakhonsathini e-philharmonic. Kodwa ngokuvamile lokhu kwenzeka ngenxa yokuthi umphakathi, kanye nabasebenzi bomphakathi we-philharmonic, abaqapheli ukuthi yini ethakazelisayo namuhla kwezobuciko bethu bokudlala. Abantu abanalo ulwazi oludingekayo, badla amahlebezi - kwesinye isikhathi iqiniso, kwesinye isikhathi akunjalo. Ngakho-ke, kuvele ukuthi abanye abadlali abanamakhono - ikakhulukazi abantu abasha - abangeni emkhakheni wokubuka izilaleli eziningi. Futhi bazizwa kabi, nabathandi bomculo bangempela. Kodwa ikakhulukazi kubaculi abancane ngokwabo. Ngenxa yokungabi nenani elidingekayo lamakhonsathi omphakathi, bayakhishwa, balahlekelwe yifomu labo.

Nginayo, ngamafuphi, - futhi ingabe nginayo ngempela? - izimangalo ezibucayi kakhulu emaphephandabeni ethu omculo nemidlalo.

Ngo-1985, Voskresensky waphenduka iminyaka engu-50 ubudala. Uyawuzwa lo mlando? Ngambuza. “Cha,” ephendula. Uma ngikhuluma iqiniso, angiyizwa iminyaka yami, nakuba amanani abonakala ekhula kancane kancane. Ngingumuntu onethemba, uyabona. Futhi ngiyaqiniseka ukuthi upiyano, uma usondela kukho ngokuvamile, kuyindaba ingxenye yesibili yokuphila komuntu. Ungathuthuka isikhathi eside kakhulu, cishe ngaso sonke isikhathi lapho uhlanganyela emsebenzini wakho. Awusoze wazi izibonelo ezithile, imibhalo ethile yokudala eqinisekisa lokhu.

Inkinga akuyona iminyaka ngese. Ukwenye. Ekuqashweni kwethu njalo, umthwalo wokusebenza kanye nokuminyana ngezinto ezahlukene. Futhi uma okuthile ngezinye izikhathi kungaphumi esiteji ngendlela esingathanda ngayo, ikakhulukazi ngenxa yalesi sizathu. Nokho, angingedwa lapha. Cishe bonke ozakwethu be-conservatory basesimweni esifanayo. Okubalulekile ukuthi sisenomuzwa wokuthi singabadlali ngokuyinhloko, kodwa i-pedagogy ithathe indawo enkulu kakhulu futhi ibalulekile ezimpilweni zethu ukuze singakunaki, hhayi ukunikela isikhathi esiningi nomzamo kukho.

Mhlawumbe nami, njengabanye oprofesa abasebenza nami, nginabafundi abaningi kunalokho okudingekayo. Izizathu zalokhu zihlukile. Ngokuvamile mina ngokwami ​​angikwazi ukwenqaba insizwa engene e-conservatory, futhi ngiyiyisa ekilasini lami, ngoba ngikholelwa ukuthi inethalente elikhanyayo, elinamandla, okungathuthuka kulo into ethakazelisayo kakhulu esikhathini esizayo.

… Maphakathi nawo-7, uVoskresensky wadlala umculo omningi kaChopin. Eqhubeka nomsebenzi oqale ekuqaleni, wenza yonke imisebenzi yepiyano eyabhalwa nguChopin. Ngiphinde ngikhumbule kusukela ekudlalweni kwalesi sikhathi amakhonsathi amaningana e-monograph anikezelwe kwabanye abathandanayo - uSchumann, Brahms, Liszt. Futhi ngemva kwalokho wakhangwa umculo Russian. Wafunda Izithombe zikaMussorgsky Embukisweni, ayengakaze awenze ngaphambili; kuqoshwe ama-sonata angu-XNUMX nguScriabin emsakazweni. Labo abaye bahlolisisa imisebenzi yomdlali wepiyano okukhulunywe ngenhla (kanye nabanye abahlobene nesikhathi sokugcina) abakwazanga ukuqaphela ukuthi uVoskresensky waqala ukudlala ngandlela-thile ngezinga elikhulu; ukuthi “izitatimende” zakhe zobuciko sezigcizelelwe, zivuthiwe, zinesisindo. Uthi: “I-Pianism iwumsebenzi wengxenye yesibili yokuphila. Nokho, ngomqondo othile lokhu kungaba yiqiniso - uma umdwebi engayeki umsebenzi wangaphakathi ojulile, uma izinguquko ezithile eziyisisekelo, izinqubo, i-metamorphoses ziqhubeka zenzeka emhlabeni wakhe ongokomoya.

“Kunolunye uhlangothi lomsebenzi obulokhu ungiheha, futhi manje ususondele kakhulu,” kusho uVoskresensky. — Ngiqonde ukudlala isitho somzimba. Ngake ngafunda nomculi wethu ovelele u-LI Roizman. Wenza lokhu, njengoba besho, yena, ukuze andise ama-horizons omculo jikelele. Amakilasi athatha cishe iminyaka emithathu, kodwa phakathi nalesi sikhathi esifushane engisithathe kumeluleki wami, kubonakala kimina, kuningi kakhulu - okuyinto engisambonga ngayo ngobuqotho. Ngeke ngithi i-repertoire yami njenge-ogani ibanzi kangako. Nokho, angizukuyigcwalisa ngenkuthalo; Noma kunjalo, okukhethekile kwami ​​​​kukwenye indawo. Nginikeza amakhonsathi omculo amaningana ngonyaka futhi ngithola injabulo yangempela kuwo. Angidingi okungaphezu kwalokho.”

… UVoskresensky ukwazile ukuzuza okuningi esiteji sekhonsathi naku-pedagogy. Futhi kufanele yonke indawo. Akukho lutho ngengozi emsebenzini wakhe. Konke kwafezwa ngomsebenzi, ithalente, ukubekezela, intando. Lapho enikeza amandla engeziwe emzabalazweni, waqina ekugcineni; lapho echitha isikhathi esiningi, walulama ngokushesha - esibonelweni sakhe, leli phethini libonakaliswa ngakho konke okusobala. Futhi wenza okufanele impela, okukhumbuza intsha ngaye.

G. Tsypin, 1990