Lev Nikolaevich Vlasenko |

Lev Vlasenko

Kukhona amadolobha anezimfanelo ezikhethekile ngaphambi kwezwe lomculo, isibonelo, i-Odessa. Mangaki amagama ahlakaniphile anikelwe esiteji sekhonsathi eminyakeni yangaphambi kwempi. I-Tbilisi, indawo okwazalelwa kuyo uRudolf Kerer, uDmitry Bashkirov, u-Eliso Virsalazze, uLiana Isakadze kanye nenani labanye abaculi abavelele, unokuthile okuziqhenya ngakho. U-Lev Nikolaevich Vlasenko naye waqala indlela yakhe yobuciko enhloko-dolobha yaseGeorgia - idolobha lamasiko amade futhi acebile obuciko.

Njengoba kuvame ukuba njalo ngabaculi besikhathi esizayo, uthisha wakhe wokuqala kwakungunina, owake wazifundisa emnyangweni wepiyano we-Tbilisi Conservatory. Ngemva kwesikhathi esithile, u-Vlasenko uya odumile uthisha Georgian Anastasia Davidovna Virsaladze, abaphothule ekilasini lakhe, iminyaka eyishumi esikoleni somculo, bese unyaka wokuqala Conservatory. Futhi, elandela indlela yamathalenta amaningi, uthuthela eMoscow. Kusukela ngo-1948, ubephakathi kwabafundi bakaYakov Vladimirovich Flier.

Le minyaka ayilula kuye. Ungumfundi wezikhungo zemfundo ephakeme ezimbili ngesikhathi esisodwa: ngaphezu kwe-conservatory, izifundo ze-Vlasenko (futhi uphothula ngempumelelo izifundo zakhe ngesikhathi esifanele) e-Institute of Foreign Languages; Umdlali wopiyano usazi kahle isiNgisi, isiFulentshi, isiNtaliyane. Futhi nokho insizwa inamandla anele namandla akho konke. E-Conservatory, uya ngokuya edlala emicimbini yabafundi, igama lakhe liyaziwa emibuthanweni yomculo. Nokho, kulindeleke okwengeziwe kuye. Ngempela, ngo-1956 Vlasenko iwine umklomelo wokuqala ku Liszt Competition e Budapest.

Ngemva kweminyaka emibili, waphinde iqhaza emncintiswaneni abaculi. Kulokhu, emzini wakhe eMoscow, Emncintiswaneni Wokuqala Wamazwe Ngamazwe weTchaikovsky, umdlali wopiyano wathola umklomelo wesibili, eshiya uVan Cliburn kuphela, ngaleso sikhathi owayeseqhulwini lwethalente lakhe elikhulu.

UVlasenko uthi: “Ngemva nje kokuphothula esikoleni samabanga aphakeme, ngabuthelwa eButhweni Lezempi LaseSoviet. Isikhathi esingangonyaka angizange ngithinte ithuluzi - ngangiphila nemicabango ehluke ngokuphelele, izenzo, izinkathazo. Futhi, yiqiniso, i-nostalgic enhle yomculo. Lapho ngidilizwa, ngaqala ukusebenza ngamandla aphindwe kathathu. Ngokusobala, ekulingiseni kwami ​​kwakukhona uhlobo oluthile lokuqabuleka kwemizwelo, amandla obuciko angasetshenzisiwe, ukomela ubuciko basesiteji. Kuyasiza njalo esiteji: kwangisiza nami ngaleso sikhathi.

Umdlali wepiyano uthi wayevame ukubuzwa lo mbuzo: yiziphi izivivinyo - eBudapest noma eMoscow - waba nesikhathi esinzima? “Yebo, eMoscow,” ephendula ezimweni ezinjalo, “Umncintiswano weTchaikovsky, engawenza kuwo, waba okokuqala ezweni lakithi. Ngokokuqala ngqa - lokho kusho konke. Wavusa isithakazelo esikhulu - wahlanganisa ndawonye abaculi abavelele kakhulu, bobabili baseSoviet nabangaphandle, ejajini, bakhanga izethameli eziningi, bangena enkabeni yokunakwa komsakazo, ithelevishini, nabezindaba. Kwakunzima kakhulu futhi kuwumthwalo wemfanelo ukudlala kulo mncintiswano - ukungenela ngakunye ophiyano kwakufanele kube nokushuba kwesimo ... "

Ukunqoba emiqhudelwaneni yomculo enedumela elihle - kanye "negolide" elawinwa uVlasenko eBudapest, futhi "isiliva" lakhe eliwine eMoscow lalibhekwa njengokunqoba okukhulu - kwamvulela iminyango yesiteji esikhulu. Uba ngumdlali wekhonsathi okhokhelwayo. Imidlalo yakhe ekhaya nakwamanye amazwe iheha izilaleli eziningi. Nokho, akamane nje anikezwe izimpawu zokunakwa njengomculi, umnikazi wemiklomelo ebalulekile. Isimo sengqondo ngaye kusukela ekuqaleni sinqunywa ngendlela ehlukile.

Kukhona esiteji, njengasempilweni, imvelo ejabulela ukuzwelana kwendawo yonke - eqondile, evulekile, eqotho. Vlasenko njengomculi phakathi kwabo. Uhlala umkholelwa: uma eshisekela ukuhumusha umsebenzi, unothando lwangempela, ujabule - ujabule kakhulu; uma kungenjalo, akakwazi ukukufihla. Lokho okuthiwa ubuciko bokusebenza akusona isizinda sakhe. Akenzi futhi akaqaqi; isiqubulo sakhe singase sithi: “Ngisho lokho engikucabangayo, ngiveza indlela engizizwa ngayo.” U-Hemingway unamagama amangalisayo achaza ngawo elinye lamaqhawe akhe: “Wayemuhle ngokweqiniso, emuhle ngokomuntu ngaphakathi: ukumamatheka kwakhe kwakusuka enhliziyweni noma kulokho okubizwa ngokuthi umphefumulo womuntu, wabe eseza ngenjabulo nangokukhululekile ubuso, okungukuthi, bukhanyise ubuso ” (Hemingway E. Ngale komfula, emthunzini wezihlahla. – M., 1961. S. 47.). Ukulalela uVlasenko ngezikhathi zakhe ezinhle kakhulu, kwenzeka ukuthi ukhumbule la mazwi.

Futhi enye into ehlaba umxhwele umphakathi lapho uhlangana nomdlali wopiyano - isiteji sakhe ukuzibandakanya. Ingabe bambalwa kulabo abazivala esiteji, bahoxe ngaphakathi kubo ngenxa yesasasa? Abanye babanda, bavinjelwe ngokwemvelo, lokhu kuzenza bazizwe bezobuciko babo: bona, ngokusho kwenkulumo evamile, abayona "i-sociable" kakhulu, bagcina umlaleli njengokungathi kude nabo. Nge-Vlasenko, ngenxa yezici zethalente lakhe (kungakhathaliseki ukuthi elobuciko noma elomuntu), kulula, njengokungathi kukodwa, ukusungula ukuxhumana nezilaleli. Abantu abamlalela okokuqala kwesinye isikhathi bazwakalisa ukumangala - umbono wukuthi kudala bemazi njengomculi.

Labo ababemazi eduze uthisha kaVlasenko, uProfessor Yakov Vladimirovich Flier, baphikisa ngokuthi kuningi abafana ngakho - umoya ogqamile we-pop, ukuphana kwemizwelo, indlela yokudlala enesibindi, esheshayo. Kwakunjalo ngempela. Akuyona into engaqondakali ukuthi, lapho efika eMoscow, uVlasenko waba umfundi weFlier, futhi omunye wabafundi abaseduze kakhulu; kamuva ubuhlobo babo bakhula baba ubungane. Nokho, ukuhlobana kwezimo zokudala zalaba baculi ababili kwabonakala ngisho nasemculweni wabo.

Abantu abadala bamahholo ekhonsathi bakhumbula kahle ukuthi uFlier wake wakhanya kanjani ezinhlelweni zikaLiszt; kukhona iphethini yokuthi uVlasenko naye wenza i-debut yakhe ngemisebenzi kaLiszt (umncintiswano ngo-1956 eBudapest).

“Ngiyamthanda lo mbhali,” kusho u-Lev Nikolaevich, “isimo sakhe sobuciko esiziqhenyayo, izindlela eziphumelelayo, i-toga ebabazekayo yothando, indlela yokukhuluma yokukhuluma. Kwenzeka ukuthi emculweni we-Liszt ngihlale ngikwazi ukuzithola… Ngiyakhumbula ukuthi kusukela ngisemncane ngangiwudlala ngentokozo ethile.

Nokho, Vlasenko, hhayi kuphela Iqalile kusuka ku-Liszt indlela yakho eya esigabeni esikhulu sekhonsathi. Futhi namuhla, eminyakeni eminingi kamuva, imisebenzi yalo mqambi iphakathi kwezinhlelo zakhe - kusukela ku-etudes, rhapsodies, transcriptions, izingcezu ezivela emjikelezweni othi "Iminyaka Yokuzulazula" kuya ku-sonatas neminye imisebenzi yefomu elikhulu. Ngakho-ke, isenzakalo esiphawulekayo empilweni ye-philharmonic yaseMoscow ngesizini ka-1986/1987 kwaba ukwenza kuka-Vlasenko womabili amakhonsathi opiyano, “Umdanso Wokufa” kanye “Nenganekwane Ezindikimbeni ZaseHungary” kaLiszt; ephelezelwa i-orchestra eqhutshwa uM. Pletnev. (Lobu busuku bunikezelwe ekugubheni iminyaka engu-175 yokuzalwa komqambi.) Impumelelo nomphakathi yayinkulu ngempela. Futhi akumangalisi. I-piano bravura ecwebezelayo, ukujabula okujwayelekile kwephimbo, isiteji esikhulu “inkulumo”, i-fresco, isitayela sokudlala esinamandla – konke lokhu kuyisici sangempela sika-Vlasenko. Lapha umculi wopiyano uvela ohlangothini olunenzuzo kakhulu kuye.

Kukhona omunye umbhali osondelene kakhulu noVlasenko, njengoba nje umbhali ofanayo wayeseduze nothisha wakhe, u-Rachmaninov. Kumaphosta we-Vlasenko ungabona amakhonsathi epiyano, ama-preludes nezinye izingcezu ze-Rachmaninoff. Uma umculi wepiyano "esigqikini", uhle ngempela kule repertoire: ukhukhula izethameli ngemizwa ebanzi, "idlula", njengoba omunye wabagxeki ebeka, enezinkanuko ezibukhali neziqinile. Uphethe ngobuciko i-Vlasenko nezinsimbi eziwugqinsi, “cello” ezidlala indima enkulu emculweni wepiyano ka-Rachmaninov. Unezandla ezinzima futhi ezithambile: umdwebo ozwakalayo "ngamafutha" useduze nemvelo yakhe kunomsindo owomile "ihluzo"; - omunye angase athi, ngokulandela isifaniso esiqale ngokudweba, ukuthi ibhulashi elibanzi lingcono kakhulu kuye kunepensela elibukhali elibukhali. Kodwa, mhlawumbe, into eyinhloko ku-Vlasenko, njengoba sikhuluma ngokuhumusha kwakhe kwemidlalo kaRachmaninov, ukuthi yena. ukwazi ukwamukela uhlobo lomculo lilonke. Hug ngokukhululekile futhi ngokwemvelo, ngaphandle kokuphazanyiswa, mhlawumbe, ngezinye izinto ezincane; Yile ndlela kanye, ngendlela, uRachmaninov noFlier abenza ngayo.

Ekugcineni, kukhona umqambi, okuthi, ngokusho kukaVlasenko, uye waba cishe oseduze kakhulu naye phakathi neminyaka. Lona nguBeethoven. Ngempela, i-sonatas kaBeethoven, ngokuyinhloko i-Pathetique, i-Lunar, eyesibili, yeshumi nesikhombisa, i-Appassionata, i-Bagatelles, imijikelezo eguquguqukayo, i-Fantasia (Op. 77), yakha isisekelo se-repertoire ka-Vlasenko yeminyaka engamashumi ayisikhombisa namashumi ayisishiyagalombili. Imininingwane ethokozisayo: engazibhekiseli kuye njengochwepheshe ezingxoxweni ezinde ngomculo - kulabo abaziyo futhi abathanda ukuyihumusha ngamazwi, u-Vlasenko, nokho, wakhuluma izikhathi eziningana ngezindaba ezimayelana noBeethoven kuCentral Television.

“Njengoba ngikhula, ngizithola ngikhanga ngokwengeziwe kulo mqambi,” kusho umculi wopiyano. "Isikhathi eside nginephupho elilodwa - ukudlala umjikelezo wamakhonsathi akhe opiyano amahlanu." U-Lev Nikolaevich wagcwalisa leli phupho, futhi kuhle kakhulu, kwesinye sezinkathi zokugcina.

Vele, u-Vlasenko, njengomdlali oyisivakashi ochwepheshe kufanele, aphendukele ezinhlobonhlobo zomculo. I-arsenal yakhe ihlanganisa uScarlatti, Mozart, Schubert, Brahms, Debussy, Tchaikovsky, Scriabin, Prokofiev, Shostakovich… Nokho, impumelelo yakhe kule repertoire, lapho kukhona okuseduze naye, nokunye okunye, akufani, akuhlali ezinzile futhi ngisho. Kodwa-ke, akufanele kusimangaze: U-Vlasenko unesitayela esicacile sokwenza, isisekelo saso esikhulu, ubuhle obuhle; udlala ngokweqiniso njengendoda - eqinile, ecacile futhi elula. Endaweni ethile iyaqinisekisa, futhi ngokuphelele, endaweni ethile hhayi impela. Akuyona into engaqondakali ukuthi uma ubhekisisa izinhlelo zikaVlasenko, uzobona ukuthi usondela kuChopin ngokuqapha ...

Ukukhuluma nge-thо eyenziwa ngumdwebi, akunakwenzeka ukuqaphela impumelelo enkulu ezinhlelweni zakhe zeminyaka yamuva. Nansi imidwebo ka-Liszt ethi B minor sonata kanye ne-etudes-peintings ka-Rachmaninov, i-Third Sonata ka-Scriabin kanye ne-Sonata ka-Ginastera, Izithombe zika-Debussy kanye ne-Island of Joy yakhe, i-Rondo ka-Hummel ku-E flat major kanye ne-Albeniz's Cordova… U-BA Arapov, osanda kufundwa nguye, kanye no-Bagatelles, u-Op. 1988 Beethoven, Preludes, Op. 126 kanye ne-11 Scriabin (nemisebenzi emisha). Ekuhunyushweni kwalezi kanye neminye imisebenzi, mhlawumbe, izici zesitayela sesimanje sikaVlasenko zibonakala ngokucacile: ukuvuthwa nokujula komcabango wobuciko, kuhlanganiswe nomuzwa ophilayo nonamandla womculo ongazange uphele ngokuhamba kwesikhathi.

Kusukela ngo-1952, uLev Nikolaevich ubefundisa. Ekuqaleni, eMoscow Choir School, kamuva Gnessin School. Kusukela ngo-1957 ubephakathi kothisha baseMoscow Conservatory; ekilasini lakhe, uN. Suk, K. Oganyan, B. Petrov, T. Bikis, N. Vlasenko nabanye abadlali bopiyano bathola ithikithi lokuphila esiteji. M. Pletnev wafunda noVlasenko iminyaka eminingana - ngonyaka wakhe wokugcina e-conservatory futhi njengomqeqeshi osizayo. Mhlawumbe lawa kwakungamakhasi agqamile futhi ajabulisa kakhulu we-pedagogical biography kaLev Nikolaevich ...

Ukufundisa kusho ukuphendula njalo eminye imibuzo, ukuxazulula izinkinga eziningi nezingalindelekile ezilethwa yimpilo, umkhuba wokufunda, kanye nentsha yabafundi. Yini, isibonelo, okufanele icatshangelwe lapho kukhethwa i-repertoire yezemfundo neyokufundisa? Ubakha kanjani ubudlelwano nabafundi? indlela yokuqhuba isifundo ukuze siphumelele ngangokunokwenzeka? Kodwa mhlawumbe ukukhathazeka okukhulu kuphakama kunoma yimuphi uthisha we-conservatory mayelana nokusebenza komphakathi kwabafundi bakhe. Futhi abaculi abasebasha ngokwabo baphikelela befuna impendulo evela kubaprofesa: yini edingekayo ukuze uphumelele esiteji? kungenzeka ukuthi ngandlela thize ukulungiselela, "ukuhlinzeka" ngakho? Ngesikhathi esifanayo, amaqiniso asobala - njengokuthi, bathi, uhlelo kufanele lufundwe ngokwanele, ngobuchwepheshe "lwenziwe", nokuthi "konke kufanele kusebenze futhi kuphume" - abantu abambalwa abanganeliseka. UVlasenko uyazi ukuthi ezimweni ezinjalo umuntu angasho into ewusizo ngempela futhi edingekayo kuphela ngesisekelo sokuhlangenwe nakho kwakhe. Kuphela uma uqala kokuhlangenwe nakho nokuhlangenwe nakho kwakhe. Empeleni, yilokhu kanye labo abafundisayo abakulindele kuye. U-AN Tolstoy wabhala: ulwazi lomuntu siqu oluthi luyinto ejwayelekile» (I-Tolstykh VI Art and Moral. - M., 1973. S. 265, 266.). Ubuciko bokufundisa, ngisho nangaphezulu. Ngakho-ke, uLev Nikolaevich ngokuzithandela ubhekisela ekusebenzeni kwakhe siqu - kokubili ekilasini, phakathi kwabafundi, nasezingxoxweni zomphakathi nezingxoxo:

“Izinto ezingalindelekile nezingachazeki zihlale zenzeka esiteji. Isibonelo, ngingafika ehholo lekhonsathi ngiphumule kahle, ngilungiselele ukusebenza, ngizethemba kimi - futhi i-clavierabend izodlula ngaphandle kwentshiseko enkulu. Futhi ngokuphambene. Ngingaya esiteji ngisesimweni esinjalo kangangokuthi kubonakala sengathi ngeke ngikwazi ukukhipha inothi elilodwa ensimbini - futhi umdlalo uzovele "uhambe". Futhi konke kuzoba lula, kube mnandi ... Yini inkinga lapha? Angazi. Futhi akekho cishe owaziyo.

Nakuba kunokuthile ongakubona kusengaphambili ukuze wenze lula imizuzu yokuqala yokuhlala kwakho esiteji - futhi iyona enzima kakhulu, engaphumuli, engathembeki ... - ngicabanga ukuthi kusengenzeka. Okubalulekile, isibonelo, ukwakhiwa kohlelo, ukwakheka kwalo. Wonke umdlali uyazi ukuthi kubaluleke kangakanani lokhu - futhi ngokunembile mayelana nenkinga yenhlalakahle ye-pop. Empeleni, ngivame ukuqala ikhonsathi ngocezu lapho ngizizwa ngizolile futhi ngizethemba ngangokunokwenzeka. Lapho ngidlala, ngizama ukulalela ngokuseduze ngangokunokwenzeka umsindo wopiyano; ukuzivumelanisa nama-acoustics wegumbi. Ngamafuphi, ngilwela ukungena ngokugcwele, ngicwilise enqubweni yokwenza, ngibe nentshisekelo kwengikwenzayo. Lena into ebaluleke kakhulu - ukuba nesithakazelo, ukuthatheka, ukugxila ngokugcwele emdlalweni. Khona-ke injabulo iqala ukuncipha kancane kancane. Noma mhlawumbe uyeke ukukuqaphela. Kusukela lapha sekuvele kuyisinyathelo esiya esimweni sokudala esidingekayo.

UVlasenko ubheka ukubaluleka okukhulu kukho konke ukuthi ngandlela thize ngaphambi kwenkulumo yomphakathi. “Ngikhumbula ngesinye isikhathi ngikhuluma ngale ndaba nomdlali wopiyano omuhle waseHungary u-Annie Fischer. Unesimiso esikhethekile ngosuku lwekhonsathi. Akadli lutho. Iqanda elilodwa elibilisiwe ngaphandle kukasawoti, futhi yilokho. Lokhu kuyamsiza ukuba athole isimo esidingekayo se-psycho-physiological esiteji - ukwesaba, ujabule ngenjabulo, mhlawumbe ngisho nokuphakanyiswa kancane. Lobo buqili obukhethekile nobukhali bemizwa buvela, okudingeka ngempela kumdlali wekhonsathi.

Konke lokhu, ngendlela, kuchazwa kalula. Uma umuntu esuthi, ngokuvamile kuvame ukuwela esimweni sokukhululeka ngokukhululekile, akunjalo? Ngokwayo, kungase kube mnandi futhi "kunethezekile", kodwa akufanelekile kakhulu ukudlala phambi kwezilaleli. Ngoyedwa kuphela ofakwe ugesi ngaphakathi, onazo zonke izintambo zomoya ezivevezela ngokushuba, ongavusa impendulo ezithamelini, azisunduzele ekuzweleni ...

Ngakho-ke, ngezinye izikhathi kwenzeka okufanayo, njengoba sengishilo ngenhla. Kungase kubonakale sengathi konke kulungele ukusebenza okuphumelelayo: umculi uzizwa emuhle, uzolile ngaphakathi, ulinganisele, cishe uqiniseka ngamakhono akhe. Futhi ikhonsathi ayinambala. Awukho umsinga womzwelo. Futhi impendulo yabalaleli, kunjalo, futhi ...

Ngamafuphi, kuyadingeka ukulungisa iphutha, ucabange ngenqubo yansuku zonke ngosuku olwandulela ukusebenza - ikakhulukazi, ukudla - kuyadingeka.

Kodwa-ke, lokhu kuwuhlangothi olulodwa kuphela lwendaba. Kunalokho yangaphandle. Ukukhuluma ngokujwayelekile, yonke impilo yomdwebi - ngokufanelekile - kufanele ibe njalo, nganoma yisiphi isikhathi, ilungele ukuphendula ngomphefumulo wayo kumuntu ophakeme, ongokomoya, omuhle ngokwenkondlo. Mhlawumbe, asikho isidingo sokufakazela ukuthi umuntu onesithakazelo kwezobuciko, othanda izincwadi, izinkondlo, imidwebo, yaseshashalazini, uthambekele kakhulu emizweni ephakeme kunomuntu ovamile, zonke izithakazelo zakhe zigxile emkhakheni. kokujwayelekile, impahla, nsuku zonke.

Abaculi abasebasha bavame ukuzwa ngaphambi kokucula: “Ungacabangi ngezilaleli! Kuyaphazamisa! Cabanga esiteji kuphela ngalokho okwenzayo ngokwakho ... ". UVlasenko uthi ngalokhu: "Kulula ukweluleka ...". Ubazi kahle ubunkimbinkimbi, ukungaqondakali, ukubili kwalesi simo:

“Ingabe zikhona izethameli engizozithathela mina mathupha ngesikhathi somdlalo? Ngiyamqaphela? Yebo futhi cha. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, uma ungena ngokuphelele ohlelweni lokudlala, kuba sengathi awucabangi ngabalaleli. Ukhohlwa ngokuphelele ngakho konke ngaphandle kwalokho okwenzayo kukhibhodi. Nokho… Wonke umculi wekhonsathi unomuzwa othile wesithupha – “umqondo wababukeli”, ngingasho. Ngakho-ke, ukusabela kwalabo abasehholo, isimo sengqondo sabantu ngakuwe kanye nomdlalo wakho, uzizwa njalo.

Uyazi ukuthi yini ebaluleke kakhulu kimi ngesikhathi sekhonsathi? Futhi okwembula kakhulu? Kuthuleke. Ngokuba konke kungahlelwa - kokubili ukukhangisa, nokuhlala kwezakhiwo, nokushaya ihlombe, izimbali, ukuhalalisela, nokunye nokunye, konke ngaphandle kokuthula. Uma ihholo libanda, libambe umoya, kusho ukuthi kukhona okwenzekayo ngempela esiteji - into ebalulekile, ejabulisayo ...

Lapho ngizwa phakathi nomdlalo ukuthi ngithathe ukunaka kwezithameli, kunginika ukuqhuma okukhulu kwamandla. Isebenza njengohlobo lwe-dope. Izikhathi ezinjalo ziyinjabulo enkulu kumdlali, ukuphela kwamaphupho akhe. Nokho, njenganoma iyiphi injabulo enkulu, lokhu kwenzeka ngokungavamile.

Kwenzeka ukuthi uLev Nikolayevich ebuzwa: ingabe ukholelwa ekuphefumulelweni kwesiteji - yena, umculi oqeqeshiwe, owenzela phambi komphakathi umsebenzi owenziwe njalo, ngezinga elikhulu, iminyaka eminingi ... " Yebo, igama elithi "ugqozi" ngokwalo » ligugile ngokuphelele, ligxiviziwe, ligugile ngenxa yokusetshenziswa njalo. Ngakho konke lokho, ngikholwe, wonke amaciko akulungele cishe ukuthandazela ugqozi. Umuzwa lapha ungowohlobo oluthile: njengokungathi ungumbhali womculo owenziwayo; sengathi konke okukuyo kwadalwa nguwe. Futhi zingaki izinto ezintsha, ezingalindelekile, eziphumelele ngempela ezizalwa ngezikhathi ezinjalo esiteji! Futhi ngokoqobo kukho konke - ekubaleni komsindo, imisho, kuma-nuances anesigqi, njll.

Ngizokusho lokhu: kungenzeka ukunikeza ikhonsathi enhle, eqinile ngisho nalapho kungekho ugqozi. Kukhona noma yiliphi inani lamacala anjalo. Kodwa uma ugqozi lufika kumculi, ikhonsathi ingaba yinto engalibaleki ... "

Njengoba wazi, azikho izindlela ezinokwethenjelwa zokuvusa ugqozi esiteji. Kodwa kungenzeka ukudala izimo ukuthi, kunoma yikuphi, kungaba kuhle kuye, kuzolungisa indawo efanele, ukholelwa uLev Nikolayevich.

“Okokuqala, i-nuance eyodwa yezengqondo ibalulekile lapha. Udinga ukwazi futhi ukholwe: ongakwenza esiteji, akekho omunye ozokwenza. Makungabi njalo yonke indawo, kodwa kuphela ku-repertoire ethile, emisebenzini yomlobi oyedwa noma ababili noma abathathu - akunandaba, akulona iphuzu. Into esemqoka, ngiyaphinda, umuzwa ngokwawo: indlela odlala ngayo, omunye ngeke adlale. Yena, lo "omunye" ocatshangwayo, angase abe nekhono elinamandla, i-repertoire ecebile, isipiliyoni esibanzi - noma yini. Kodwa-ke, ngeke acule leli gama ngendlela owenza ngayo, ngeke athole umthunzi onjalo othakazelisayo nocashile ...

Umuzwa engikhuluma ngawo manje kumele ujwayele umculi wekhonsathi. Ikhuthaza, iphakamisa, isiza ezikhathini ezinzima esiteji.

Ngivame ukucabanga ngothisha wami u-Yakov Vladimirovich Flier. Wayehlale ezama ukujabulisa abafundi - wabenza bakholelwa kubo. Ngezikhathi zokungabaza, lapho izinto zingahambanga kahle kithi, ngandlela thize wafaka umoya omuhle, ithemba, nomoya omuhle wokudala. Futhi lokhu kwasilethela thina, bafundi bekilasi lakhe, inzuzo engangabazeki.

Ngicabanga ukuthi cishe wonke umculi owenza esiteji esikhulu sekhonsathi uyaqiniseka ekujuleni komphefumulo wakhe ukuthi udlala kangcono kunabanye. Noma, kunoma yikuphi, mhlawumbe uyakwazi ukudlala kangcono ... Futhi asikho isidingo sokusola noma ubani ngalokhu - kunesizathu salokhu ukuzilungisa.

… Ngo-1988, kwaba nefestiveli enkulu yomculo yamazwe ngamazwe e-Santander (Spain). Idonse ukunaka okukhethekile komphakathi - phakathi kwababambe iqhaza kwakungu-I. Stern, M. Caballe, V. Ashkenazy, nabanye abaculi abavelele baseYurophu nabaphesheya kwezilwandle. Amakhonsathi kaLev Nikolaevich Vlasenko abanjwe ngempumelelo yangempela ngaphakathi kohlaka lwalo mkhosi womculo. Abagxeki bakhulume ngokuncoma ngethalente lakhe, ikhono, ikhono lakhe lokujabula “lokuthatheka futhi ahehe…” Imidlalo yaseSpain, njengolunye uhambo luka-Vlasenko engxenyeni yesibili yeminyaka yamashumi ayisishiyagalombili, iqinisekise ngokugculisayo ukuthi intshisekelo kwezobuciko bakhe ayizange idambise. Usesendaweni evelele empilweni yekhonsathi yesimanje, eSoviet nakwamanye amazwe. Kodwa ukugcina le ndawo kunzima kakhulu kunokuwina.

G. Tsypin, 1990