Mikhail Vasilievich Pletnev |

UMikhail Pletnev

UMikhail Vasilyevich Pletnev udonsela ukunaka kwabo bobabili ochwepheshe kanye nomphakathi jikelele. Uyathandwa ngempela; Ngeke kube ihaba ukusho ukuthi kulokhu uhluke ngandlela thize ohlwini olude lwabahlomuli bemiqhudelwano yamazwe ngamazwe eminyakeni yamuva. Imidlalo yomdlali wopiyano icishe iphele ngaso sonke isikhathi futhi akukho okukhombisa ukuthi lesi simo singase sishintshe.

U-Pletnev uyingcweti eyinkimbinkimbi, engavamile, enesici sakhe, ubuso obukhumbulekayo. Ungamncoma noma cha, umemezele ukuthi ungumholi wezobuciko bepiyano zesimanje noma ngokuphelele, "ngaphandle kwe-blue", wenqabe konke akwenzayo (kwenzeka), kunoma yikuphi, ukujwayelana naye akushiyi abantu abangenandaba. Futhi yilokho okubalulekile, ekugcineni.

… Wazalwa ngo-April 14, 1957 e-Arkhangelsk, emndenini wabaculi. Kamuva wathuthela nabazali bakhe eKazan. Umama wakhe, owayengumdlali wopiyano ngokwemfundo, wake wasebenza njengomdlali nothisha. Ubaba wayengumdlali we-accordion, efundisa ezikhungweni zemfundo ezihlukahlukene, futhi iminyaka eminingana ekhonza njengomsizi kaprofesa eKazan Conservatory.

UMisha Pletnev wathola ikhono lakhe lomculo kusenesikhathi - kusukela eneminyaka emithathu wafinyelela upiyano. Kira Alexandrovna Shashkina, uthisha Kazan Special Music School, waqala ukumfundisa. Namuhla ukhumbula u-Shashkina kuphela ngezwi elinomusa: "Umculi omuhle ... Ngaphezu kwalokho, u-Kira Alexandrovna wakhuthaza imizamo yami yokuqamba umculo, futhi ngingambonga kakhulu ngalokhu."

Lapho ngineminyaka engu-13, Misha Pletnev wathuthela eMoscow, lapho aba umfundi Central Music School ekilasini EM Timakin. Uthisha ovelele, owavula indlela eya esiteji kwabahambeli abaningi abadumile kamuva, u-EM Timakin wasiza uPletnev ngezindlela eziningi. “Yebo, yebo, kakhulu. Futhi cishe endaweni yokuqala - enhlanganweni yemishini ye-motor-technical. Uthisha ocabanga ngokujulile futhi okuthakazelisayo, u-Evgeny Mikhailovich ungcono kakhulu ekwenzeni lokhu. Pletnev wahlala ekilasini Timakin iminyaka eminingana, kwathi lapho esengumfundi, wathuthela uprofesa eMoscow Conservatory, Ya. V. Flier.

U-Pletnev akazange abe nezifundo ezilula noFlier. Futhi hhayi kuphela ngenxa yezidingo eziphakeme zikaYakov Vladimirovich. Futhi hhayi ngoba bemele izizukulwane ezahlukene kwezobuciko. Ubuntu babo bokudala, abalingiswa, isimo sengqondo sasihluke kakhulu: oshisekayo, oshisekayo, naphezu kweminyaka yakhe, uprofesa, nomfundi owayebukeka ehluke ngokuphelele, cishe i-antipode ... Kodwa uFlier, njengoba besho, kwakungelula ngePletnev. Kwakungelula ngenxa yesimo sakhe esinzima, esinenkani, esingenakunqotshwa: wayenombono wakhe siqu futhi ozimele cishe kuyo yonke into, akazange azishiye izingxoxo, kodwa, ngokuphambene nalokho, wazifuna ngokukhululekile - bathatha kancane ukholo ngaphandle. ubufakazi. Abazibonele bathi uFlier ngezinye izikhathi kwakudingeka aphumule isikhathi eside ngemva kwezifundo noPletnev. Ngesinye isikhathi, njengokungathi uthe uchitha amandla amaningi esifundweni esisodwa naye njengoba ewachitha kumakhonsathi amabili eyedwa ... Konke lokhu, nokho, akuzange kuphazamise uthando olujulile lukathisha nomfundi. Mhlawumbe, kunalokho, kwamqinisa. I-Pletnev "ingoma ye-swan" ka-Flier uthisha (ngeshwa, kwakungadingeki ukuba aphile ngokuvumelana nokunqoba okukhulu komfundi wakhe); uprofesa wakhuluma ngaye ngethemba, ngokuthakasela, ekholelwa ekusaseni lakhe: “Uyabona, uma edlala ngalo lonke ikhono lakhe, uyokuzwa ngempela into engavamile. Lokhu akwenzeki kaningi, ngikholwe - nginolwazi olwanele… ” (Gornostaeva V. Izingxabano ezizungeze igama // isiko Soviet. 1987. March 10.).

Futhi kufanele kukhulunywe omunye umculi, obala labo Pletnev abakweletwayo, ababenabo oxhumana nabo abade kakhulu bokudala. Lona uLev Nikolaevich Vlasenko, ekilasini lakhe waphothula e-Conservatory ngo-1979, wabe eseba umsizi oqeqeshwayo. Kuyathakazelisa ukukhumbula ukuthi leli thalente ngezindlela eziningi liwukucushwa kokudala okuhlukile kunokwaPletnev: ukuphana kwakhe, imizwa evulekile, ububanzi bokwenza izinto - konke lokhu kukhaphela kuye ummeleli wohlobo oluhlukile lobuciko. Kodwa-ke, kwezobuciko, njengasempilweni, okuphambene kuvame ukuhlangana, kube usizo futhi kuyadingeka komunye nomunye. Kunezibonelo eziningi zalokhu ekuphileni kwansuku zonke kwe-pedagogical, kanye nomkhuba wokwenza umculo ohlangene, njll, njll.

… Emuva eminyakeni yakhe yesikole, u-Pletnev wabamba iqhaza kuMqhudelwano Womculo Wamazwe Ngamazwe eParis (1973) futhi wawina iGrand Prix. Ngo-1977 wathola umklomelo wokuqala ku-All-Union Piano Competition eLeningrad. Kwabe sekulandela esinye sezenzakalo eziyinhloko, eziwujuqu zempilo yakhe yobuciko - ukunqoba kwegolide eMqhudelwaneni Wesithupha weTchaikovsky (1978). Yilapho indlela yakhe yobuciko obukhulu iqala khona.

Kuyaphawuleka ukuthi ungene esiteji sekhonsathi esecishe abe yiciko eliphelele. Uma ngokuvamile ezimweni ezinjalo umuntu kufanele abone ukuthi umfundi ukhula kanjani kancane kancane abe yinkosi, umfundi abe ngumculi ovuthiwe, ozimele, khona-ke ngePletnev kwakungenakwenzeka ukukubona lokhu. Inqubo yokuvuthwa kokudala yaphenduka yaba lapha, njengokungathi, inqanyuliwe, ifihliwe emehlweni ahlolayo. Izithameli ngokushesha zajwayelana nomdlali wekhonsathi ozinze kahle - ezolile futhi ehlakaniphile ezenzweni zakhe, ezilawula ngokuphelele, azi ngokuqinile. ukuthi ufuna ukusho futhi as kufanele kwenziwe. Ayikho into eyayingavuthiwe ngokobuciko, engathandeki, engahlaliseki kahle, efana nomfundi eyabonwa emdlalweni wakhe - nakuba ayeneminyaka engu-20 kuphela ngaleso sikhathi enolwazi oluncane kanye nesiteji, wayengenakho.

Phakathi kontanga yakhe, wayehlukaniswa ngokuphawulekayo kokubili ngobuqotho, ukuqina kokuhumusha, kanye nesimo sengqondo esimsulwa kakhulu, esiphakeme ngokomoya emculweni; lena yakamuva, mhlawumbe, yayithandeka kakhulu kuye… Futhi kuyisici ukuthi kwakuyilo mbhalo owenzekile waba omunye weziphetho zokudala zomculi osemusha. Izilaleli zasekupheleni kweminyaka engamashumi ayisikhombisa - ekuqaleni kweminyaka engamashumi ayisishiyagalombili akunakwenzeka ukuthi zikhohliwe u-Arietta (ingxenye yesibili ye-sonata) eyenziwa nguPletnev - ngokokuqala ngqa le nsizwa yamshaya ngendlela yayo yokubiza, njengokungathi, ngezwi eliphansi. , inesisindo esikhulu futhi ibalulekile, umbhalo womculo. Ngendlela, uye walondoloza le ndlela kuze kube yilolu suku, ngaphandle kokulahlekelwa umphumela wayo wokulutha ezilalelini. (Kukhona i-aphorism ehlekisayo lapho bonke abaculi bekhonsathi bengahlukaniswa ngezigaba ezimbili eziyinhloko; abanye bangadlala kahle ingxenye yokuqala ye-Sonata ka-Beethoven yamashumi amathathu nesibili, abanye bangadlala ingxenye yesibili yayo. UPletnev udlala izingxenye zombili ngokulinganayo kahle; lokhu akuvamile ukwenzeka.).

Ngokuvamile, uma ubheka emuva ekuqaleni kukaPletnev, umuntu akanakuhluleka ukugcizelela ukuthi ngisho nalapho esemncane, kwakungekho lutho olungenangqondo, olukha phezulu ekudlaleni kwakhe, akukho lutho oluvela ku-virtuoso tinsel engenalutho. Ngesu lakhe elihle kakhulu lokudlala ipiyano - elihle futhi elihlakaniphile - akazange anikeze isizathu sokuzihlambalaza ngenxa yemiphumela yangaphandle.

Cishe kusukela ekudlalweni kokuqala komdlali wopiyano, ukugxekwa kwakhuluma ngomqondo wakhe ocacile nonengqondo. Ngempela, ukubonakaliswa komcabango kuhlale kukhona ngokucacile kulokho akwenzayo kukhibhodi. “Hhayi ukushuba kokunyakaza komoya, kodwa ukulingana ucwaningo”- yilokhu okunqumayo, ngokusho kuka-V. Chinaev, ithoni ejwayelekile yobuciko bukaPletnev. Umgxeki uyanezela: “I-Pletnev ihlola ngempela indwangu enomsindo - futhi ikwenza ngokungenasici: yonke into igqanyiswa - ngemininingwane emincane kakhulu - ama-nuances ama-plexuses aqoshiwe, umqondo wezilinganiso ezidayishiwe, eziguquguqukayo, ezihlelekile zivela engqondweni yomlaleli. Umdlalo wengqondo yokuhlaziya - ukuzethemba, ukwazi, okungenakuphikiswa ” (Chinaev V. Ukuzola kokucaca // Sov. umculo. 1985. No. 11. P. 56.).

Ngesinye isikhathi engxoxweni eyanyatheliswa emaphephandabeni, umkhulumeli kaPletnev wathi kuye: "Wena, Mikhail Vasilievich, ubhekwa njengomculi wesitolo sobuhlakani. Kala mayelana nalokhu okuhle nokubi okuhlukahlukene. Kuyathakazelisa ukuthi uqondeni ngobuhlakani kwezobuciko bomculo, ikakhulukazi, ukucula? Futhi ubuhlakani kanye nokuqondisisa kuhlobana kanjani emsebenzini wakho?"

“Okokuqala, uma uthanda, mayelana nengqondo,” ephendula. - Kimina kubonakala sengathi intuition njengekhono iseduze nalokho esikusho ngethalente lobuciko nokudala. Ngenxa ye-intuition - ake sikubize, uma uthanda, isipho sokuhlinzeka ngobuciko - umuntu angazuza kakhulu kwezobuciko kunokuqwala intaba yolwazi olukhethekile nolwazi. Kunezibonelo eziningi zokusekela umbono wami. Ikakhulukazi emculweni.

Kodwa ngicabanga ukuthi umbuzo kufanele ubekwe ngokuhlukile kancane. Kungani or enye into or okunye? (Kodwa, ngeshwa, lena yindlela abajwayele ukubhekana ngayo nale nkinga esikhuluma ngayo.) Kunganjani kungabi ne-intuition ethuthuke kakhulu. more ulwazi oluhle, ukuqonda okuhle? Kungani kungabi yi-intuition kanye nekhono lokuqonda ngokunengqondo umsebenzi wokudala? Ayikho inhlanganisela engcono kunalena.

Kwesinye isikhathi uye uzwe ukuthi ulwazi oluningi lungamcindezela ngokwezinga elithile umuntu oqanjiwe, luvale isiqalo esihlakaniphile kuye ... angicabangi kanjalo. Kunalokho, ngokuphambene nalokho: ulwazi nokucabanga okunengqondo kunikeza amandla engqondo, ubukhali. Yibeke ezingeni eliphezulu. Uma umuntu ezwa ubuciko ngobuqili futhi ngesikhathi esifanayo enekhono lemisebenzi yokuhlaziya ejulile, uzodlulela phambili ekudaleni kunomuntu othembele kuphela emvelweni wemvelo.

Kodwa-ke, labo baculi engibathanda ngokukhethekile kwezobuciko bomculo nezokwenziwa bahlukaniswa nje ngenhlanganisela evumelanayo yokuzwisisayo - kanye nokunengqondo-okunengqondo, ukungazi - kanye nokuqaphela. Bonke banamandla kokubili ekuqageleni kwabo kwezobuciko nasekuhlakanipheni kwabo.

… Bathi ngenkathi umdlali wopiyano ovelele wase-Italy u-Benedetti-Michelangeli evakashele eMoscow (kwakuphakathi nawo-XNUMX), wabuzwa komunye wemihlangano nabaculi basenhloko-dolobha - ukuthi yini, ngokubona kwakhe, ebaluleke kakhulu kumdlali. ? Waphendula: ulwazi lomculo-theory. Ufuna ukwazi, akunjalo? Futhi ulwazi lwethiyori lusho ukuthini kumenzi ngomqondo obanzi waleli gama? Lokhu ukuhlakanipha kochwepheshe. Kunoma ikuphi, ingqikithi yayo. ”… (Impilo yomculo. 1986. No. 11. P. 8.).

Ukukhuluma ngobuhlakani bukaPletnev sekunesikhathi eside kuqhubeka, njengoba kuphawuliwe. Ungabezwa bobabili emibuthanweni yochwepheshe naphakathi kwabathandi bomculo abajwayelekile. Njengoba omunye umbhali odumile wake waphawula, kunezingxoxo okuthi, uma seziqalile, aziyeki ... Empeleni, kwakungekho lutho olusolisayo kulezi zingxoxo ngokwazo, ngaphandle kokuthi ukhohlwe: kulokhu, akufanele sikhulume "ngokubandayo" kukaPletnev (okuqondwa mandulo). ukube wayebanda nje, empofu ngokomzwelo, wayengeke enze lutho esiteji sekhonsathi) futhi hhayi ngohlobo oluthile "lokucabanga" ngaye, kodwa ngesimo sengqondo esikhethekile somculi. I-typology ekhethekile yethalente, "indlela" ekhethekile yokubona nokuveza umculo.

Ngokuqondene nokuvimbela ngokomzwelo kukaPletnev, okukhulunywa ngakho kakhulu, umbuzo uwukuthi, ingabe kufanelekile ukuphikisana ngokuthanda? Yebo, i-Pletnev iyimvelo evaliwe. Ubunzima obungokomzwelo bokudlala kwakhe kwesinye isikhathi bungafinyelela cishe ukuzincisha injabulo - ngisho nalapho enza uTchaikovsky, omunye wababhali bakhe abathandayo. Ngandlela-thile, ngemva kokucula komdlali wopiyano, kwavela isibuyekezo emaphephandabeni, umbhali wawo asebenzisa inkulumo ethi: “amagama angaqondile” - ayenembile futhi eqondile.

Okunjalo, siyaphinda, kuyisimo sobuciko somculi. Futhi umuntu angajabula kuphela ukuthi "akadlali", akasebenzisi izimonyo zasesiteji. Ekugcineni, phakathi kwalabo ngempela ube nokuthile ongakusho, ukuzihlukanisa akuvamile: kokubili ekuphileni nasesiteji.

Lapho u-Pletnev enza okokuqala njengomculi wekhonsathi, indawo evelele ezinhlelweni zakhe yayithathwe imisebenzi ka-JS Bach (Partita in B minor, Suite in A minor), Liszt (Rhapsodies XNUMX no-XNUMX, Piano Concerto No. XNUMX), Tchaikovsky ( Izinguquko ku-F ezinkulu, amakhonsathi epiyano), i-Prokofiev (I-Sonata Yesikhombisa). Kamuva, wadlala ngempumelelo imisebenzi eminingi ka-Schubert, i-Third Sonata ka-Brahms, edlala kusukela kumjikelezo we-Year of Wanderings kanye ne-Liszt's Twelfth Rhapsody, i-Islamey ka-Balakirev, i-Rhapsody ka-Rachmaninov ku-Theme of Paganini, i-Grand Sonata, I-Opuvsky Seasons ka-Tikocha ngamunye. .

Akunakwenzeka ukuthi ingasaphathwa eyobusuku bakhe be-monographic enikelwe kuma-sonatas kaMozart noBeethoven, ingasaphathwa eye-Second Piano Concerto yaseSaint-Saens, izandulela kanye namafugue kaShostakovich. Ngesizini ka-1986/1987 i-Haydn's Concerto ku-D Major, i-Debussy's Piano Suite, i-Preludes ka-Rachmaninov, i-Op. 23 nezinye izingcezu.

Ngokuphikelela, ngenhloso eqinile, u-Pletnev ufuna imikhakha yakhe yesitayela esiseduze kakhulu naye ku-piano repertoire yomhlaba. Uzama ngokwakhe kwezobuciko ababhali abahlukene, izinkathi, izitayela. Ngezindlela ezithile naye uyehluleka, kodwa ezimweni eziningi uthola lokho akudingayo. Okokuqala, emculweni wekhulu lesi-XNUMX (JS Bach, D. Scarlatti), kuma-Viennese classics (Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven), kwezinye izifunda zokudala ze-romanticism (Liszt, Brahms). Futhi-ke, emibhalweni yababhali bezikole zaseRussia naseSoviet.

Okunye okuphikiswana ngakho yi-Chopin ka-Pletnev (i-sonatas Yesibili neyesithathu, ama-polonaise, ama-ballads, ama-nocturnes, njll.). Kulapha, kulo mculo, lapho umuntu eqala khona ukuba nomuzwa wokuthi umshayi wopiyano ngezinye izikhathi akanakho ukushesha nokuvuleleka kwemizwa; ngaphezu kwalokho, kuyisici ukuthi ku-repertoire ehlukile akukaze kwenzeke ukukhuluma ngakho. Kulapha, emhlabeni wezinkondlo zikaChopin, lapho uqaphela ngokuzumayo ukuthi uPletnev akathambekele kakhulu ekuthululeni inhliziyo, ukuthi, ngokwemibandela yesimanje, akakhulumi kakhulu, nokuthi kuhlale kunebanga elithile phakathi. yena nabalaleli. Uma abadlali abathi, lapho beqhuba “inkulumo” yomculo nomlaleli, babonakale bethi “wena” naye; Pletnev njalo futhi kuphela "kuwe".

Nelinye iphuzu elibalulekile. Njengoba wazi, e-Chopin, e-Schumann, emisebenzini yabanye abathandanayo, umculi uvame ukudingeka ukuthi abe nokudlala okungenakuqhathaniswa kwemizwa, ukucabangela nokungaqiniseki kokunyakaza okungokomoya, ukuguquguquka kwe-nuance engokwengqondo, ngamafuphi, konke okwenzekayo kuphela kubantu benqolobane ethile yezinkondlo. Kodwa-ke, uPletnev, umculi nomuntu, unokuthile okuhlukile… Ukuthuthukiswa kwezothando akusondeli kuye futhi - leyo nkululeko ekhethekile nokuxega kwendlela yasesiteji, lapho kubonakala sengathi umsebenzi ngokuzenzakalelayo, uvele uvele ngokuzenzakalelayo ngaphansi kweminwe umculi wekhonsathi.

Ngendlela, omunye wezazi zomculo ezihlonishwa kakhulu, owake wavakashela ukusebenza komdlali wepiyano, waveza umbono wokuthi umculo kaPletnev "uyazalwa manje, ngalo mzuzu" (Tsareva E. Ukudala isithombe somhlaba // Sov. umculo. 1985. No. 11. P. 55.). Akunjalo? Bekungeke yini kube nembe kakhudlwana ukusho ukuthi kungenye indlela? Kunoma yikuphi, kuvame kakhulu ukuzwa ukuthi yonke into (noma cishe yonke into) emsebenzini kaPletnev icatshangwa ngokucophelela, ihlelwe, futhi yakhiwe kusengaphambili. Futhi-ke, ngokunemba kwayo okungokwemvelo nokuvumelana, ifakwe "entweni". Ifakwe ngokunemba kwe-sniper, cishe ngamaphesenti ayikhulu okushayekile kokuhlosiwe. Lena indlela yobuciko. Lesi yisitayela, futhi isitayela, uyazi, umuntu.

Kuyisibonakaliso ukuthi uPletnev umculi ngezinye izikhathi uqhathaniswa noKarpov umdlali we-chess: bathola okuthile okufanayo ngesimo nendlela yemisebenzi yabo, ezindleleni zokuxazulula imisebenzi yokudala ababhekene nayo, ngisho "nesithombe" sangaphandle salokho. bayakha - eyodwa ngemuva kwepiyano yekhibhodi, abanye ku-chessboard. Ukwenza ukuhumusha kwePletnev kuqhathaniswa nezakhiwo ezicacile, ezivumelanayo nezilinganayo zeKarpov; lezi zokugcina, nazo, zifaniswa nezakhiwo zomsindo zikaPletnev, ezingenasici ngokwengqondo yokucabanga kanye namasu okubulala. Kuwo wonke ama-analogies anjalo, kukho konke ukuzithoba kwawo, aphethe ngokucacile okuthile okuheha ukunaka ...

Kuyafaneleka ukwengeza kulokho okushiwo ukuthi isitayela sobuciko sikaPletnev ngokuvamile sivamile kubuciko bomculo kanye nemidlalo yesikhathi sethu. Ikakhulukazi, leso anti-improvisational isigaba incarnation, okusanda kukhonjwa. Okufanayo kungabonakala endleleni abaculi abavelele namuhla. Kulokhu, njengakwezinye izinto eziningi, iPletnev iyisimanje kakhulu. Mhlawumbe yingakho kunenkulumompikiswano eshubile ezungeze ubuciko bakhe.

… Uvame ukunikeza umbono womuntu ozethemba ngokuphelele - kokubili esiteji nasempilweni yansuku zonke, ekuxhumaneni nabanye. Abanye abantu bayayithanda, abanye abayithandi ngempela ... Engxoxweni efanayo naye, izingcezu zazo ezicashunwe ngenhla, lesi sihloko sathintwa ngokungaqondile:

- Yiqiniso, uyazi, uMikhail Vasilyevich, ukuthi kukhona abaculi abavame ukuzicabangela ngokweqile ngezinga elilodwa noma elinye. Abanye, ngokuphambene nalokho, bahlushwa ukubukelwa phansi kwegama labo elithi "I". Ungakwazi yini ukuphawula ngaleli qiniso, futhi kungaba kuhle kule angle: ukuzethemba kwangaphakathi komdwebi kanye nempilo yakhe yokudala. Impela okudala...

- Ngokubona kwami, konke kuncike ekutheni umculi ukusiphi isigaba somsebenzi. Ukusiphi isigaba. Ake sithi umculi othile ufunda isiqephu noma uhlelo lwekhonsathi olusha kuye. Ngakho-ke, kuyinto eyodwa ukungabaza ekuqaleni komsebenzi noma ngisho naphakathi kwawo, lapho nimunye ngomculo kanye nawe. Futhi okunye - esiteji ...

Nakuba umculi eyedwa, ngesikhathi ematasa nomsebenzi, kungokwemvelo ukuthi angazethembi, abukele phansi akwenzile. Konke lokhu kungokuhle kuphela. Kodwa uma uzithola usemphakathini, isimo siyashintsha, futhi ngokuyisisekelo. Lapha, noma yiluphi uhlobo lokuzindla, ukuzibukela phansi kugcwele izinkinga ezinkulu. Ngezinye izikhathi akunakulungiseka.

Kunabaculi abahlale bezihlupha ngemicabango yokuthi ngeke bakwazi ukwenza okuthile, bazobhuqa entweni, bayofeyila ndawana thize; njll. Futhi ngokuvamile, bathi, yini okufanele bayenze esiteji lapho kukhona, yithi, uBenedetti Michelangeli emhlabeni ... Kungcono ukungaveli esiteji nemiqondo enjalo. Uma umlaleli ehholo engazethembi umdwebi, uvele alahlekelwe yinhlonipho ngaye. Ngakho (lokhu kubi kunakho konke) kanye nobuciko bakhe. Akukho ukuqiniseka kwangaphakathi - akukho ukuncenga. Umdlali uyangabaza, umenzi uyangabaza, nezilaleli nazo ziyangabaza.

Ngokuvamile, ngingakufingqa kanje: ukungabaza, ukubukela phansi imizamo yakho ohlelweni lomsebenzi wesikole - futhi mhlawumbe nokuzethemba okwengeziwe esiteji.

– Ukuzethemba, uthi … Kuhle uma lesi sici sitholakala kumuntu ngokomthetho. Uma esemvelweni yakhe. Futhi uma kungenjalo?

“Khona angazi. Kodwa kukhona okunye engikwaziyo ngokuqinile: wonke umsebenzi wokuqala wohlelo olulungiselela ukuboniswa esidlangalaleni kufanele wenziwe ngokucophelela okukhulu. Unembeza womdlali, njengoba besho, kufanele ube msulwa ngokuphelele. Bese kufika ukuzethemba. Okungenani kunjalo kimi (Impilo yomculo. 1986. No. 11. P. 9.).

… Emdlalweni kaPletnev, ukunaka kuhlale kudonswa ukucophelela kwesiphetho sangaphandle. Ukujaha ubucwebe bemininingwane, ukunemba okungenasici kwemigqa, ukucaca kwamakhonsathi omsindo, nokuqondanisa okuqinile kwezilinganiso kuyamangalisa. Empeleni, uPletnev ubengeke abe uPletnev ukube bekungengenxa yalokhu kuphelela ngokuphelele kukho konke okuwumsebenzi wezandla zakhe - uma kungenjalo ngenxa yaleli khono lobuchwepheshe elihehayo. "Ezobuciko, isimo esihle siyinto enhle, ikakhulukazi lapho ugqozi lungangeni khona ngamagagasi anesiphepho ..." (Ekudlalwa komculo. – M., 1954. P. 29.)– wake wabhala VG Belinsky. Wayecabanga ngomlingisi wesimanje u-VA Karatygin, kodwa waveza umthetho wendawo yonke, ongahlobene nje nemidlalo yaseshashalazini, kodwa futhi nesiteji sekhonsathi. Futhi akekho omunye ngaphandle kukaPletnev oyisiqinisekiso esihle salo mthetho. Angaba nothando olukhulu noma oluncane ngenqubo yokwenza umculo, angakwazi ukwenza okuningi noma okuncane ngempumelelo - into kuphela angeke abe yikho wubudlabha ...

"Kunabadlali bamakhonsathi," kuqhubeka uMikhail Vasilievich, lapho edlala khona kwesinye isikhathi ezwa uhlobo oluthile lokulinganisa, ukudweba. Manje, ubheka, "bagcoba" indawo enzima ngobuchwepheshe nge-pedal, bese bephonsa izandla zabo ngobuciko, baphonsa amehlo abo ophahleni, baphambukise ukunaka komlaleli entweni eyinhloko, kusukela kukhibhodi ... ongaziwa kimi. Ngiyaphinda: Ngiqhubekela phambili esicathulweni sokuthi emsebenzini owenziwe esidlangalaleni, yonke into kufanele ilethwe ekupheleleni okugcwele kobuchwepheshe, ubukhali, nokuphelela kobuchwepheshe ngesikhathi somsebenzi wesikole. Empilweni, ekuphileni kwansuku zonke, sihlonipha abantu abathembekile kuphela, akunjalo? - futhi asihloniphi labo abasidukisayo. Kuyafana nasesiteji.”

Ngokuhamba kweminyaka, uPletnev uqinisa kakhulu kuye. Indlela aqondiswa ngayo emsebenzini wakhe yenziwa ibe lukhuni. Imigomo yokufunda imisebenzi emisha iba yinde.

“Uyabona, ngisengumfundi futhi ngisaqala ukudlala, izidingo zami zokudlala zazingasekelwe kuphela kulokho engikuthandayo, imibono, izindlela zobungcweti, kodwa nalokho engakuzwa kothisha bami. Ngokwezinga elithile, ngazibona ngisemqondweni wombono wabo, ngazahlulela ngokwami ​​ngokwemiyalo yabo, ukuhlaziya, kanye nezifiso zabo. Futhi kwakungokwemvelo ngokuphelele. Kwenzeka kuwo wonke umuntu uma efunda. Manje mina ngokwami, kusukela ekuqaleni kuze kube sekugcineni, nginquma isimo sami sengqondo ngalokho okwenziwe. Kuyathakazelisa kakhulu, kodwa futhi kunzima kakhulu, kunomthwalo wemfanelo kakhudlwana.”

* * *

I-Pletnev namuhla ihamba kancane, iqhubekela phambili njalo. Lokhu kubonakala kuzo zonke izibukeli ezingenalo ubandlululo, noma ubani uyazi kanjani bona. Futhi Ufuna bheka, kunjalo. Ngesikhathi esifanayo, kungaba okungalungile ukucabanga, yebo, ukuthi indlela yakhe ihlale iqondile futhi iqondile, ingenazo noma yimaphi ama-zigzag angaphakathi.

“Ngeke ngisho nangayiphi indlela ukuthi manje ngifinyelele entweni enganyakazi, yokugcina, eqinile. Angikwazi ukusho: ngaphambili, bathi, ngenze amaphutha afana nalokhu noma anjalo, kodwa manje ngiyazi konke, ngiyaqonda futhi ngeke ngiphinde ngiphinde amaphutha. Yebo, eminye imibono eyiphutha nokubala okungalungile kwesikhathi esidlule kuba sobala kimina phakathi neminyaka. Kodwa-ke, ngikude nokucabanga ukuthi namuhla angiweli kwezinye izinkohliso ezizokwenza bazizwe kamuva.

Mhlawumbe kuwukungabikezeli kokuthuthuka kukaPletnev njengomculi - lezo zimanga nezimangazayo, ubunzima nokuphikisana, lezo zinzuzo nokulahlekelwa okubandakanya lokhu kuthuthukiswa - futhi kubangela ukwanda kwesithakazelo kubuciko bakhe. Intshisekelo efakazele amandla nokuzinza kwayo ezweni lakithi naphesheya.

Yiqiniso, akuwona wonke umuntu othanda uPletnev ngokulinganayo. Akukho okunye okungokwemvelo nokuqondakalayo. Umlobi ovelele we-Soviet prose u-Y. Trifonov wake wathi: “Ngokombono wami, umbhali akakwazi futhi akufanele athandwe yiwo wonke umuntu” (Trifonov Yu. Indlela izwi lethu lizophendula ngayo ... - M., 1985. S. 286.). Nomculi. Kodwa cishe wonke umuntu uyamhlonipha uMikhail Vasilyevich, ngaphandle kokushiya iningi labalingani bakhe esiteji. Cishe ayikho inkomba enokwethenjelwa futhi eyiqiniso, uma sikhuluma ngeqiniso, hhayi izimfanelo ezicatshangwayo zomdlali.

Inhlonipho uPletnev ayithokozelayo iqhutshwa kakhulu ngamarekhodi akhe egilamafoni. Ngendlela, ungomunye walabo baculi abangagcini nje ukulahlekelwa ekurekhodweni, kodwa ngezinye izikhathi baze bawine. Isiqinisekiso esihle kakhulu salokhu ama-disc abonisa ukusebenza komdlali wopiyano we-sonatas eminingana ye-Mozart ("Melody", 1985), i-sonata encane ye-B, "Mephisto-Waltz" nezinye izingcezu zikaLiszt ("Melody", 1986), the Ikhonsathi Yokuqala Yepiyano kanye nethi “Rhapsody on a Theme Paganini” kaRachmaninov (“Melody”, 1987). "Izinkathi" nguTchaikovsky ("Melody", 1988). Lolu hlu lungaqhutshekwa uma uthanda...

Ngaphezu kwento eyinhloko ekuphileni kwakhe - ukudlala upiyano, uPletnev ubuye aqambe, aqhube, afundise, futhi enze eminye imisebenzi; Ngamafuphi, kuthatha okuningi. Manje, noma kunjalo, uya ngokuya ecabanga ngeqiniso lokuthi akunakwenzeka ukusebenza njalo kuphela "nge-bestowal". Ukuthi kuyadingeka ukuthi wehlise ijubane ngezikhathi ezithile, ubheke nxazonke, ubone, ufane ...

“Sidinga ukonga okuthile kwangaphakathi. Kuphela uma bekhona, kuba nesifiso sokuhlangana nabalaleli, ukwabelana ngalokho onakho. Kumculi oculayo, kanye nomqambi, umbhali, umdwebi, lokhu kubaluleke kakhulu - isifiso sokwabelana ... Ukutshela abantu lokho okwaziyo nokuzizwayo, ukuveza isasasa lakho lokudala, ukuthanda kwakho umculo, ukuqonda kwakho. Uma singekho isifiso esinjalo, awuyena umculi. Futhi ubuciko bakho akuwona ubuciko. Ngiye ngaqaphela izikhathi ezingaphezu kwesisodwa, lapho ngihlangana nabaculi abakhulu, ukuthi yingakho begibela esiteji, ukuthi badinga ukuveza imibono yabo yokudala esidlangalaleni, ukutshela ngesimo sabo sengqondo kulokhu noma lowo msebenzi, umbhali. Ngiyaqiniseka ukuthi lena ukuphela kwendlela yokuphatha ibhizinisi lakho. "

G. Tsypin, 1990

Ngo-1980 uPletnev wenza i-debut yakhe njengomqhubi. Ukunikeza amandla amakhulu omsebenzi wepiyano, wayevame ukubonakala e-console ye-orchestra ehamba phambili yezwe lethu. Kodwa ukukhuphuka komsebenzi wakhe wokuqhuba kwafika kuma-90s, lapho uMikhail Pletnev esungula i-Russian National Orchestra (1990). Ngaphansi kobuholi bakhe, i-orchestra, ehlangene phakathi kwabaculi abangcono kakhulu kanye nabantu abanomqondo ofanayo, ngokushesha yathola idumela njengelinye lama-orchestra amahle kakhulu emhlabeni.

Ukuqhuba umsebenzi kaMikhail Pletnev ucebile futhi uhlukahlukene. Kumasizini adlule, i-Maestro ne-RNO yethule inqwaba yezinhlelo ze-monographic ezinikezelwe ku-JS Bach, Schubert, Schumann, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Liszt, Wagner, Mahler, Tchaikovsky, Rimsky-Korsakov, Scriabin, Prokofiev, Shostakovich, Stravinsky… Ukwandisa ukunaka kumqhubi kugxile ohlotsheni lwe-opera: ngo-Okthoba 2007, uMikhail Pletnev wenza i-debut yakhe njengomqhubi we-opera e-Bolshoi Theatre nge-opera kaTchaikovsky ethi The Queen of Spades. Eminyakeni eyalandela, umqhubi wenza amakhonsathi ka-Rachmaninov ka-Aleko noFrancesca da Rimini, uCarmen ka-Bizet (PI Tchaikovsky Concert Hall), kanye ne-Rimsky-Korsakov May Night (Arkhangelskoye Estate Museum).

Ngaphezu kokubambisana okunezithelo neRussian National Orchestra, uMikhail Pletnev usebenza njengomqhubi oyisivakashi namaqembu omculo ahamba phambili njengeMahler Chamber Orchestra, Concertgebouw Orchestra, Philharmonia Orchestra, London Symphony Orchestra, Birmingham Symphony Orchestra, Los Angeles Philharmonic Philharmonic Orchestra, Tokyo …

Ngo-2006, uMikhail Pletnev wadala iMikhail Pletnev Foundation for the Support of National Culture, inhlangano umgomo wayo, kanye nokuhlinzeka ngengqondo eyinhloko kaPletnev, i-Russian National Orchestra, ukuhlela nokusekela amaphrojekthi amasiko aphezulu kakhulu, njengeVolga. I-Tours, ikhonsathi yesikhumbuzo yokukhumbula izisulu zezinhlekelele ezimbi eBeslan, uhlelo lomculo nokufundisa "Umlingo Womculo", oklanyelwe ngqo abafundi bamakhaya ezintandane kanye nezikole zokuhlala zezingane ezikhubazekile ngokomzimba nangokwengqondo, uhlelo lokubhalisa esikoleni. Ihholo Lekhonsathi “I-Orchestrion”, lapho amakhonsathi ebanjwa khona kanye ne-MGAF, okuhlanganisa nezakhamuzi ezingavikelekile emphakathini, umsebenzi omkhulu we-discographic kanye noMkhosi Omkhulu we-RNO.

Indawo ebaluleke kakhulu emsebenzini wokudala we-M. Pletnev ithathwa ngokuqamba. Phakathi kwemisebenzi yakhe kukhona i-Triptych ye-Symphony Orchestra, Fantasy for Violin and Orchestra, Capriccio for Piano and Orchestra, amalungiselelo opiyano ama-suites avela emculweni we-ballet i-Nutcracker kanye ne-The Sleeping Beauty kaTchaikovsky, izingcaphuno zomculo we-ballet u-Anna Karenina ka. Shchedrin, Viola Concerto, ilungiselelo le-clarinet ye-Beethoven's Violin Concerto.

Imisebenzi kaMikhail Pletnev ihlale iphawulwa ngezindondo eziphakeme - ungumnqobi wezindondo zoMbuso nezamazwe ngamazwe, okuhlanganisa nezindondo zeGrammy kanye ne-Triumph. Kuphela ngo-2007, umculi waklonyeliswa uMklomelo kaMongameli we Russian Federation, i-Order of Merit for the Fatherland, III degree, Order of Daniel of Moscow, eyanikezwa ubungcwele Patriarch Alexei II of Moscow and All Russia.